Jump to season: 2010-2011 | 2011-2012 | 2012-2013
Player |
FGA |
TS% |
%Shots at Rim |
FG% at Rim |
%Assisted at Rim |
%Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
%Assisted 2pt Jumpers |
%Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
%assisted 3pt |
FTA/FGA |
FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Travis Bader |
418 |
0.573 |
8% |
53% |
35% |
24% |
33% |
42% |
69% |
38% |
89% |
0.37 |
88% |
Duke Mondy |
280 |
0.483 |
26% |
58% |
5% |
41% |
33% |
11% |
33% |
29% |
56% |
0.25 |
88% |
Corey Petros |
209 |
0.517 |
63% |
57% |
76% |
37% |
41% |
66% |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.72 |
51% |
Ryan Bass |
206 |
0.475 |
29% |
53% |
23% |
39% |
24% |
5% |
33% |
33% |
68% |
0.37 |
84% |
Drew Valentine |
185 |
0.571 |
54% |
65% |
59% |
21% |
44% |
12% |
25% |
30% |
100% |
0.50 |
62% |
Dante Williams |
75 |
0.506 |
27% |
70% |
43% |
24% |
22% |
25% |
49% |
32% |
100% |
0.31 |
65% |
Matt Poches |
34 |
0.523 |
44% |
67% |
40% |
53% |
33% |
0% |
3% |
0% |
--- |
0.44 |
73% |
Raphael Carter |
22 |
0.710 |
86% |
79% |
47% |
14% |
67% |
50% |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.59 |
46% |
Lloyd Neely |
16 |
0.434 |
75% |
58% |
43% |
25% |
25% |
0% |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.62 |
20% |
Jordan Howenstine |
4 |
0.101 |
25% |
0% |
--- |
25% |
0% |
--- |
50% |
0% |
--- |
0.50 |
50% |
Joey Asbury |
3 |
0.000 |
67% |
0% |
--- |
0% |
--- |
--- |
33% |
0% |
--- |
0.00 |
--- |
Mitch Baenziger |
2 |
0.750 |
50% |
0% |
--- |
0% |
--- |
--- |
50% |
100% |
100% |
0.00 |
--- |
Juevol Myles |
1 |
0.000 |
0% |
--- |
--- |
100% |
0% |
--- |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.00 |
--- |
TEAM |
1455 |
0.527 |
32% |
59% |
47% |
31% |
33% |
29% |
37% |
35% |
83% |
0.42 |
71% |
Shot Type |
% of shots |
FG% |
% of Shots Blocked |
Unblocked FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
At Rim |
33% |
71% |
4% |
74% |
2pt Jumpers |
28% |
44% |
1% |
44% |
3pt Shots |
40% |
35% |
0% |
35% |
This table describes the first shot taken after gaining possession. Only possessions that start with a rebound, made basket by the opponent, steal, or dead ball turnover are considered. Shots that occur after the defense has fouled are not included.
Start of poss |
% of initial shots |
eFG% |
% Shots at rim |
FG% at rim |
% Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
% Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rebound, 0-10 s |
10% |
48% |
22% |
56% |
24% |
28% |
53% |
36% |
Rebound, 11-35 s |
19% |
49% |
27% |
57% |
36% |
34% |
37% |
38% |
Opp score, 0-10 s |
8% |
43% |
26% |
57% |
30% |
31% |
44% |
29% |
Opp score, 11-35 s |
42% |
46% |
25% |
60% |
39% |
35% |
36% |
31% |
Steal, 0-10 s |
9% |
54% |
49% |
62% |
10% |
45% |
41% |
31% |
Steal, 11-35 s |
4% |
61% |
26% |
73% |
33% |
29% |
40% |
53% |
Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s |
1% |
31% |
38% |
33% |
19% |
0% |
44% |
29% |
Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s |
7% |
37% |
42% |
41% |
34% |
19% |
25% |
37% |
This table is similar to the one above, but describes the results for opponents during games against OAKLAND.
Start of poss |
% of initial shots |
eFG% |
% Shots at rim |
FG% at rim |
% Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
% Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rebound, 0-10 s |
12% |
54% |
45% |
72% |
11% |
47% |
43% |
25% |
Rebound, 11-35 s |
23% |
59% |
24% |
71% |
29% |
44% |
47% |
41% |
Opp score, 0-10 s |
4% |
47% |
32% |
80% |
23% |
9% |
45% |
29% |
Opp score, 11-35 s |
43% |
57% |
25% |
69% |
32% |
48% |
43% |
38% |
Steal, 0-10 s |
7% |
70% |
65% |
91% |
14% |
30% |
21% |
20% |
Steal, 11-35 s |
2% |
58% |
46% |
58% |
27% |
29% |
27% |
57% |
Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s |
1% |
62% |
31% |
50% |
23% |
100% |
46% |
33% |
Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s |
8% |
52% |
24% |
55% |
32% |
33% |
44% |
43% |
Updated 2013-04-09