Jump to season: 2010-2011 | 2011-2012 | 2012-2013
Player |
FGA |
TS% |
%Shots at Rim |
FG% at Rim |
%Assisted at Rim |
%Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
%Assisted 2pt Jumpers |
%Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
%assisted 3pt |
FTA/FGA |
FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paris Gulley |
308 |
0.494 |
12% |
56% |
40% |
44% |
37% |
22% |
45% |
33% |
87% |
0.30 |
79% |
Jordan Aaron |
303 |
0.490 |
24% |
42% |
3% |
30% |
40% |
0% |
46% |
30% |
48% |
0.29 |
89% |
Demetrius Harris |
153 |
0.481 |
65% |
56% |
64% |
34% |
37% |
11% |
1% |
0% |
--- |
0.87 |
44% |
Austin Arians |
123 |
0.494 |
15% |
58% |
64% |
9% |
18% |
50% |
76% |
33% |
94% |
0.13 |
62% |
James Haarsma |
117 |
0.462 |
50% |
53% |
42% |
32% |
24% |
11% |
18% |
10% |
100% |
0.52 |
80% |
J.J. Panoske |
115 |
0.451 |
30% |
50% |
76% |
18% |
29% |
50% |
52% |
28% |
94% |
0.15 |
82% |
Kyle Kelm |
79 |
0.507 |
37% |
66% |
53% |
25% |
25% |
20% |
38% |
23% |
71% |
0.39 |
84% |
Ryan Haggerty |
52 |
0.524 |
38% |
60% |
67% |
23% |
42% |
40% |
38% |
35% |
100% |
0.40 |
48% |
Evan Richard |
25 |
0.505 |
20% |
40% |
50% |
40% |
60% |
50% |
40% |
20% |
100% |
0.48 |
75% |
Thierno Niang |
22 |
0.349 |
18% |
25% |
0% |
32% |
14% |
0% |
50% |
27% |
33% |
0.36 |
62% |
Christian Wolf |
10 |
0.450 |
40% |
75% |
100% |
60% |
0% |
--- |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.70 |
86% |
Mitch Roelke |
9 |
0.642 |
0% |
--- |
--- |
11% |
100% |
0% |
89% |
38% |
67% |
0.44 |
75% |
Quinton Gustavson |
6 |
0.537 |
50% |
67% |
100% |
0% |
--- |
--- |
50% |
33% |
100% |
0.83 |
40% |
TEAM |
1322 |
0.486 |
29% |
53% |
50% |
30% |
35% |
17% |
40% |
30% |
78% |
0.37 |
69% |
Shot Type |
% of shots |
FG% |
% of Shots Blocked |
Unblocked FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
At Rim |
40% |
60% |
11% |
67% |
2pt Jumpers |
30% |
38% |
6% |
41% |
3pt Shots |
30% |
33% |
0% |
33% |
This table describes the first shot taken after gaining possession. Only possessions that start with a rebound, made basket by the opponent, steal, or dead ball turnover are considered. Shots that occur after the defense has fouled are not included.
Start of poss |
% of initial shots |
eFG% |
% Shots at rim |
FG% at rim |
% Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
% Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rebound, 0-10 s |
12% |
47% |
35% |
60% |
23% |
41% |
42% |
27% |
Rebound, 11-35 s |
23% |
50% |
25% |
62% |
29% |
38% |
46% |
33% |
Opp score, 0-10 s |
5% |
48% |
24% |
58% |
35% |
35% |
41% |
35% |
Opp score, 11-35 s |
44% |
46% |
26% |
53% |
35% |
37% |
40% |
32% |
Steal, 0-10 s |
5% |
38% |
45% |
57% |
17% |
0% |
38% |
22% |
Steal, 11-35 s |
4% |
49% |
19% |
71% |
25% |
22% |
56% |
35% |
Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s |
2% |
31% |
25% |
50% |
44% |
43% |
31% |
0% |
Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s |
6% |
35% |
21% |
46% |
32% |
40% |
47% |
17% |
This table is similar to the one above, but describes the results for opponents during games against MILWAUKEE.
Start of poss |
% of initial shots |
eFG% |
% Shots at rim |
FG% at rim |
% Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
% Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rebound, 0-10 s |
16% |
49% |
39% |
63% |
24% |
35% |
38% |
29% |
Rebound, 11-35 s |
22% |
47% |
29% |
62% |
39% |
32% |
32% |
34% |
Opp score, 0-10 s |
6% |
49% |
43% |
59% |
28% |
32% |
29% |
35% |
Opp score, 11-35 s |
34% |
50% |
31% |
56% |
31% |
44% |
38% |
34% |
Steal, 0-10 s |
8% |
72% |
66% |
81% |
14% |
54% |
20% |
37% |
Steal, 11-35 s |
3% |
47% |
26% |
70% |
38% |
27% |
36% |
36% |
Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s |
2% |
38% |
36% |
50% |
29% |
50% |
36% |
10% |
Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s |
7% |
42% |
34% |
50% |
35% |
45% |
30% |
20% |
Updated 2013-04-09